Reading streak: 0 days
An article · Message
Why do my thoughts come out jumbled when I try to explain something
You are not disorganised. You are trying to deliver a thought that has not finished being one.
Someone asks you a simple question and you begin confidently. Three sentences in you hear yourself double back, start a clause you cannot finish, and reach for a word that will not come. Their face does the thing faces do when they are being patient, and you speed up to escape the sentence, which makes it worse.
This is not a sign that you think badly or that your mind is slow. It is a sequencing failure, and sequencing is curable.
What is going wrong is not the thinking, it is the order. You are composing and delivering at the same time, in front of an audience, at speaking speed, and speech is far too fast a medium to write in. So you begin with whatever surfaced first, discover mid sentence that it needed a piece of context you have not given yet, and reverse to install it. That reversal is what the listener hears as jumbled. It belongs to the second dimension, Message, and specifically to the part of it that decides what goes first and what gets left out.
An engineer I know could not explain her own work at family gatherings. Put her at a whiteboard and she was lucid. Put her across a dinner table and it came out as a tangle. Nothing about her knowledge changed between those two rooms. At the whiteboard she had a structure in front of her holding the order while she spoke. At the table she was holding the order and speaking at the same time, and one of the two had to give.
The advice people offer here is to slow down. It sounds sensible and it rarely works, because speed was never the fault. A slow tangle is still a tangle. Slowing down mostly gives you more time to compose in public, which is the exact activity that was hurting you.
Two people describe themselves in the same words and need opposite corrections. One has not actually thought the thing through, and her tangle is honest, it is thinking happening out loud. The other has thought it through completely and still tangles, because he has never decided what order to release it in. Identical complaint, and a course on structured thinking helps only one of them.
Once you know this, the tangle is easy to catch in your own mouth. Listen for the reversal, the moment you say sorry, let me back up, or actually, before that. Every one of those is the same event, a piece of context arriving after the sentence that needed it. You are not losing your thread. You are discovering your order too late.
The drill is to decide the order before you open your mouth, and to decide only three things. One, the single sentence that says what this is. Two, the one piece of context they need before that sentence makes sense. Three, what you want them to do or think when you stop. Then say the context, the sentence, the ask, in that order. Practise it out loud on something small every day. Explain your afternoon to someone. Describe a film. Answer a question you have already been asked once. Change the subject every time, because the point is not to memorise an explanation, it is to build the habit of ordering before speaking, which is what the whiteboard had been doing for her all along.
There is a Done For You version of this, run against the explanations you actually have to give at work. It sits inside the work, not on this page.
If you want to find out whether Message is where yours breaks, The First Call is fifteen minutes, free, and it is a conversation rather than a test. You talk, I listen, and you leave with the dimension named. One door: saswatlife.com.
Next on the shelf: Why do I hesitate and lose fluency mid sentence · or see the five dimensions the articles draw from.
When you are ready:
The First Call